Hi, wizards. I went through my dead-tree library, CPAN, and other places, and found nothing that answers this question, so I'm going to kick it out to the community...
Question one: I've inherited a program (if it matters, the program's compiled to an executable, rather than run by the interpreter) that uses about a dozen different modules and, picky soul that I am, I'd like to list them in alphabetic order rather than all higgledy-piggledy as they are now. Is the order in which modules are use-ed significant? That is, is there a difference-either at compile time or at run-time-between this list: Use Win32; use Win32::Process; use Win32::API; use Win32::AdminMisc; use Win32::GUI; use Win32::TieRegistry; use Win32::Service; use Win32::Sound; use Getopt::Std; use File::Copy; use File::Content; And this list: use File::Content; use File::Copy; use Getopt::Std; Use Win32; use Win32::API; use Win32::AdminMisc; use Win32::GUI; use Win32::Process; use Win32::Service; use Win32::Sound; use Win32::TieRegistry; I know, it's entirely cosmetic, but, as James Cagney said in "The Strawberry Blonde", "that's just the kind of hairpin I am." Question two: In the code's library list, use Win32::Process appears twice. Is this necessary? Is it okay? Is it justifiable? The code works with the double use statement, so I'm guessing it's okay. Just wondering if removing the second invocation would be a problem rather than a solution. Thanks, O Wise Ones. Deane Rothenmaier Programmer/Analyst - IT-StdCfg Walgreens Corp. 2 Overlook Point #N51022D MS 6515 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 224-542-5150 Vincit qui patitur. -- Persius
_______________________________________________ ActivePerl mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
