i still don't have the need to change the core itself, so i'm
interested in what you might be needing to change, since AS is very
open to adapt many things, and i've been doing it widely. care for
telling us?


On Sep 9, 7:04 pm, greghauptmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bump (still interested if someone has an opion)
>
> On Sep 8, 9:16 am, greghauptmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi - mind if I double check the following.  If I am overridding some
> > ActiveScaffold code, and also noting I was to keep updating to the
> > latest ActiveScaffold edge code periodically:
>
> > Should I move my changes from within the vendor/plugin code area to
> > say the "/lib" area and make a ruby file with the model/class and just
> > that method I'm overridding.  Is this correct?  Or should I learn
> > about how ActiveScaffold plugins work and try to following this
> > approach?   (currently I've just modified the code in the "vendor/
> > plugin/activescaffold" area itself)
>
> > thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

  • ov... greghauptmann
    • ... greghauptmann
      • ... naaano
        • ... Sri Sri
          • ... greghauptmann
            • ... Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables - Symbol Servicios Informáticos S.L. ::.

Reply via email to