A new column is fine with me. However can we still use the built-in ajax template, e.g. inline, position and etc. ?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Kenny Ortmann <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes this is necessary. Active Scaffold is supposed to be used as a CRUD > interface,(reate, read, update, delete). Those are the actions that the > action links allow. You don't have to make your link an action link. I > work with a legacy system and we are converting it to Rails so there tends > to be some really weird functionality on the legacy side. Any time I have > needed another link in one of my active scaffold lists, I normally just add > it in as a new column. > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:59 PM, rvhi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> Using rail 2.2.2 and AS. >> >> I am trying to disable certain custom action links, e..g foobar, on a >> per-record basis. I got it working by using authorized_for_foobar? in >> model. Then in action_link definition, the crud_type is defined as >> foobar. It works with one twist. I had to modify file lib/ >> active_record_permissions.rb and remove the following line in method >> authorized_for? >> >> raise ArgumentError, "unknown action #{options[:action]}" if >> options[:action] and ![:create, :read, :update, :destroy].include? >> (options[:action]) >> >> Apparently the only allowed actions are the standard ones. >> >> Is it necessary? Maybe should include the defined custom action in the >> list? I just don't like to modify this line of code in future upgrade. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
