Volker, I see, this does work well if I want to embed the restaurant table within the franchises table. However, if I want to give a URL for just the restaurants of that franchise, I must go directly to the url generated by conf.nested.add_link - the same as the url in the thread above.
In any case, it seems that I could have found this url earlier if I had started by using this nested.add_link function. Jonathan On Jan 12, 1:31 am, vhochstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Yes, I would bet there is a better way to accomplish this. :-) > > However, that might depend on your specific application. > > eg: If your models have associations defined then you should be able > to do a conf.nested.add_link :restaurants in your franchise > active_scaffold_config. > > -- > Volker > > On Jan 12, 9:02 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sure - its a site for a restaurant services company with franchises. > > Every franchise has restaurants, customers, expenses, etc. So, the > > route above creates a table view of each of the restaurants or > > customers or expenses in each franchise. Each element on the table > > columns has its own action links. > > > btw, I did not write initial code - so there may be a better way to > > accomplish this now. In particular I'm wondering if there is a way to > > do this with faster page loads. > > > Jonathan > > > On Jan 11, 11:11 pm, vhochstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > just to satisfy my curiosity. Why do you need to define that route? > > > > -- > > > Volker > > > > On Jan 12, 2:36 am, "[email protected]" > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Volker, thanks, this was very helpful. I had to change: > > > > > "#{controller}/nested/#{id}?associations=#{association}" > > > > > to > > > > > "#{association}?assoc_id=#{id}&association=#{association} > > > > &eid=#{controller}_#{franchise_id}_#{association} > > > > &parent_model=#{controller_name_singular}" > > > > > btw, is this documented anywhere? > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > On Jan 11, 4:22 am, vhochstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > nested action is gone. instead it s just an index action now. > > > > > eg: > > > > > GET "/players2? > > > > > assoc_id=2&association=players&eid=teams_2_players&parent_model=team&adapte > > > > > r=_list_inline_adapter > > > > > > index action is part of default rails routing and you do not need to > > > > > specify specific routes. > > > > > > -- > > > > > Volker > > > > > > On Jan 11, 11:30 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I upgraded an existing rails 2.2.2/ruby1.8/active scaffold project > > > > > > to > > > > > > rails 3.0.3/ruby1.9.1. > > > > > > > I have been able to get several active scaffolds to work properly, > > > > > > however I have some scaffolds that were at the url / route: > > > > > > >http://localhost/{controller}/nested/{id}?associations={association} > > > > > > > Now, when I try to go to this url, I get the message: > > > > > > > "Unknown action > > > > > > > The action 'nested' could not be found for {controller}" > > > > > > > I have tried many different combinations of routing, and traced the > > > > > > code, but I can not determine why the nested active scaffold does > > > > > > not > > > > > > render like it did before the upgrade. > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > On Jan 10, 11:50 pm, vhochstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > > > You do not have to configure any special routes to get nested > > > > > > > Activescaffolds up and running. > > > > > > > > Can you please give some more details about the issue you are > > > > > > > facing? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Volker > > > > > > > > On Jan 10, 8:36 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I have attempted using this syntax, but it does not appear to > > > > > > > > work for > > > > > > > > a nested ActiveScaffold. > > > > > > > > > Can someone kindly recommend how to define the routes of > > > > > > > > controller > > > > > > > > with nested ActiveScaffolds using Rails 3 fork from vhochstein > > > > > > > > branch? > > > > > > > > > On Dec 4 2010, 12:42 pm, Jeff Surrett <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The new syntax would be: > > > > > > > > > > resources :location do > > > > > > > > > as_routes > > > > > > > > > # other routes for location > > > > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 4, 12:59 am, MichaelLatta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I am using theRails3fork from vhochstein and trying to get > > > > > > > > > > setup > > > > > > > > > > working. I have used an older version of active scaffold > > > > > > > > > > underRails > > > > > > > > > > 2.x. > > > > > > > > > > > Using "resources :location, :activescaffold => true" does > > > > > > > > > > not appear > > > > > > > > > > to generate the needed routes. Are the required routes > > > > > > > > > > needed to be > > > > > > > > > > added to the standard resource routes listed somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > Should this > > > > > > > > > > generate the missing reoutes? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
