I was away for a while but now I am back. sorry for the delay.
I have created a form override for families called _form.html.erb
containing:
<code>
<ol class="form" <%= 'style="display: none;"' if columns.collapsed -
%>>
<% column = active_scaffold_config.columns[:account_name] -%>
<li class="form-element <%= 'required' if column.required? %> <%=
column.css_class unless column.css_class.nil? %>">
<%= render :partial => form_partial_for_column(column), :locals
=> { :column => column } -%>
</li>
</ol>
<%= render :active_scaffold => "family_contacts", :constraints =>
{ :family_id => @record.id } %>
</code>
When I edit a family record, the form opens as expected with a field
from the family table and an embedded form of family_contacts which
belongs_to family (with the appropriate has_many relationship in
family). When I try to edit a family contact record, the inline form
appears as expected and allows me to make changes to its fields, but
when I click the update button, it updates the record but then gets
"Redirected to
http://localhost:3000/family_contacts?eid=be3a15b3b3877d869549f3505e42fc76";
I would like for the update to occur and remain on the current page.
On Jan 7, 12:32 am, vhochstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Well, let s see how far we get. Currently, it seems that UJS is nt
> working in your nested scaffold. Can you please post what you did so
> far?
>
> --
> Volker
>
> On Jan 6, 3:48 pm, Jeff Surrett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I would like to have the user be able to edit a form which would
> > include nested active scaffolds for each has_many association instead
> > of using subforms like it does currently. I think that using nested
> > scaffolds gives a more consistent look and feel and more flexibility
> > such as sorting of records, using action_links on the group of records
> > like the new batch action and other custom actions.
>
> > The important part for this to work, is that any actions performed on
> > the nested (embedded) scaffold would just update (replace) that
> > scaffold inline similar to how it works with nested scaffolds now.
>
> > On Jan 6, 2:36 am, vhochstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I ve never tried, but it is an interesting idea.
> > > What is your specific requirement for such a feature?
>
> > > --
> > > Volker
>
> > > On Jan 6, 12:08 am, Jeff Surrett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Is there a way of having nested scaffolds appear for the associated
> > > > tables instead of subforms in an update form? I tried to embed a
> > > > scaffold in a form override but when I update a record in the embedded
> > > > scaffold, it takes me the main page for that scaffold instead of
> > > > updating inline. I am using Vhochstein's rails 3 branch of AS.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
