Sorry I got moved off of my RubyOnRails project at work and have had to deal with Liferay/Java portlets for the past year. I just got put back on the RubyOnRails project and might start paying more attention.
I agree with vhochstein though. The effort to move active scaffold to rails 3 and keep it up and stable is far greater than what it is worth. I knew the code was going to be hard to move to rails 3 and that is why I didn't try to do it right away. Basically all of the inner guys of active scaffold should be re-written and if you have to do that then why not just start from scratch. Every time something in rails changed that broke active scaffold, active scaffold was hacked to work with rails instead of being fixed the right way(or at least that's what it seemed like to me the 2 years I was working with it). Sergio/vhochstein thanks for all the work the past couple years. On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:59 PM, vhochstein <[email protected]>wrote: > It s good to see that there are still some guys out there who are > interested in activescaffold project. > > However, the past has shown that just to be interested is not enough > to keep that project up and running. > Core Team has degraded to one Person (Sergio thanks a lot for all your > work and answering all those questions), > commits to activescaffold are more a less just bugfixes > postings to this group are less than for example a year ago > Other projects like rails_admin getting more attention > > To be honest I do not see a bright future for activescaffold. > > You may ask why I ve decided to do a rails 3 version anyway... That s > a good question and if I had known the effort and work to get it done > it advance, I would nt have done it. > Core reason was and still is that I ve got several projects up and > running with activescaffold and I needed an option to use rails 3. > > If anybody else is using my fork great, if anybody else wants to > contribute also great, if somebody wants to fork or merge, yeah sure > go ahead, that s the reason I love git and which drives a project > forward. > > However, if you ask me how I see the future of activescaffold.. I > think I ve already given that answer. There are really too few > developers involved in this project, no marketing, etc. > > Bottomline, if you would like to revamp core activescaffold, I wish > you all the best. > However, I do not think that I will join at this point, because I just > do not believe that it will work. > > Sorry guys but just my two cents. > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
