Thanks for the clarification :-) Im perfectly fine with 3.3.0rcs in my current apps btw.
RM Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2013 13:18:18 UTC+1 schrieb Sergio Cambra: > > No, there was a correspondence when AS was updated very few times, then AS > only was updated to work with new rails versions. But now I usually add > new > features, and I can use patch numbering (although it's not a good > practice), > but sometimes I need to do some changes which break backwards > compatibility, > then I prefer to increment minor number, so I will release 3.3.0 which > will > work with rails 3.2 > > You can look at CHANGELOG on master > If you use rails-3.2 branch (or 3.2.19 version) and you don't get warnings > you > should be ok to update to 3.3.0 > > El Jueves, 14 de febrero de 2013 02:21:50 Atastor escribió: > > A question specifically to Sergio: As far as I understood so far there > is a > > correspondence between AS version numbering and Rails, both being > currently > > at 3.2. > > > > The current master versions of AS though are numbered 3.3.0rc, but Rails > is > > heading for 4.0. > > > > Why is that so? Is there a planned 3.3 version of Rails coming that I am > > not aware of? Or are there major changes of AS on the way (which I am > not > > aware of, either), which justify a divergence of the numbering? > > > > Puzzled > > Michael > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
