Phil Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >How can you be sure we're not doing reduction? After all, 'make > >check' in i18n mode demands libnewt-utf8-pic is installed. > > Yah, but libnewt-utf8-pic installs as /usr/lib/libnewt-utf8_pic.a, whereas > mklibs.py will be looking for a libnewt_pic.a (since libnewt-utf8's soname > is still libnewt.so.0). I'm pretty sure this means that mklibs will give up > and just copy the .so over.
Hmm, ok, so installing libnewt-utf8_pic.a would be totally useless? > >Perhaps we need to demand that in fact no libnewt*pic packages are > >installed for "heterogenous" i18n builds such as i386 where some > >flavors are i18n and some are not. > > Seems like a reasonable plan, yes. That's what I do no. Regarding slang, are we in the same boat? Do they have the same soname? Removing all slang*-pic packages is not an option because it makes the image no long fit... -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
