Hi Aleksi, I don't think anyone wants to keep the policy as it is. I back the calls (albeit too late now in the policy process) to change the text so it includes organisations that have *any* IPv6, including PI. Simple really.
James -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aleksi Suhonen Sent: 23 January 2015 11:02 To: [email protected] Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption Hello, I'd like to state again, that sticking to the current policy is only hurting people that have already adopted IPv6 using PI space. "The bad guys" that aren't even planning to ever adopt IPv6 will happily reserve an IPv6 block just to get more IPv4 addresses. I hope this message gets across to the people who oppose 2014-04. You're not helping your own cause. For more information, read the archives of the 2014-04 discussion from last year. -- +358 4567 02048 / http://www.trex.fi/ Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy `What I need,' shouted Ford, by way of clarifying his previous remarks, `is a strong drink and a peer-group.' -- Douglas Adams, Life the Universe and Everything
