On 20.02.2015 12:49, Martin Millnert wrote: > Is the intent of the original policy is to exclude new entrants from > competing with established service providers?
I would formulate it like "it is a not so bad side-effect that the current big players don't need to fear new players" ... otherwise it is not understandable, why some big players are sitting on their not (and sometimes never before) used IPv4-Space instead of returning it. As already mentioned in GM in Warsaw, a pretty easy way to relax the IPv4-Situation in RIPE-Region would be to change the charging-scheme to pay per IP ... but that's out of scope of apwg ... so let's stay with "It is only an unintended side-effect." BR -- Jens Ott Opteamax GmbH Simrockstr. 4b 53619 Rheinbreitbach Tel.: +49 2224 969500 Fax: +49 2224 97691059 Email: [email protected] HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
