Hi Antonis -
On 19.03.2015 09:54, Antonis Lioumis wrote:
> Recently my company got a /22 allocation through the well known transfer
> procedure between LIR's.
> In the past we also got the /22 we qualify from RIPE NCC's last /8. This
> /22 was put aside for future use.
> For aggregation purposes we asked RIPE NCC to return both /22 and get
> back a /21 but according to current policies this is forbidden.
> Since global routing table has exceeded 500000 prefixes and expected to
> grow more maybe RIPE community should rethink permitting the exchange of
> smaller IPv4 blocks with contiguous one.
how about sending text for a policy (change) in this respect? :-)
Cheers,
Carsten
