On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
Hello!
Greetings,
Petr means opening multiple LIR's and requesting /22's for all these LIR's at
once.
"Opening multiple LIR's" == workaround, as in "a way to cheat the system".
if you are lucky RIPE NCC will process you requests one after another and
allocate you adjacent range of IP's.
It shouldn't be a matter of luck...
As you say "allocate you", that implies ONE organization.
And ONE organization should only get ONE /22... ;-)
Regards,
Carlos
28.04.2015, 09:24, "Carlos Friacas" <[email protected]>:
Hello,
Noone (in the RIPE/NCC service region) is able to get more than a /22,
according to current policies, or did i miss something?
If someone is asking (and actually getting) more than a /22, those
allocations need to be revoked -- i honestly thought current policy
already included that...
Regards,
Carlos
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015, Petr Umelov wrote:
Hi everybody.
Let me tell some words about current proposal.
Many providers (among them is our company) need to get (e.g.) /20 subnet (not
4 x /22). If we ask the RIPE NCC to allocate 4 x /22, we can get next variants:
1. /20
2. 2 x /21 from different subnets
3. /22, /21, /22
There is only one chance to get /20 100% - make request for 7 x /22 (if the
tickets will be processed together). But in this case we will have unwanted 3 x
/22 which we can transfer to other LIRs to minimize our expenses.
And also we can get different separate 4 x /22 (the worst case) and we have to
transfer such blocks and make new request.
If this proposal will be agreed, many providers (new and old) will have
material losses. So I can't support this proposal.
--
Kind regards,
Techincal Director FastTelecom
Petr Umelov
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
