Hi Sacha,
On 11/05/15 19:00, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
In light of this, I will oppose this proposal. For what that will
turn out to be worth.
if I understand correctly, you are opposing to the RIPE NCC's planned
implementation of this proposal (under the terms and understanding of
this Impact Analysis), is that correct?
What If once the policy proposal would become policy and would be
implemented, _all all allocations made after the implementation date_
will need to have a 2 years 'buffer' - would that be acceptable?
I just want to clearly understand the reason for opposing.
regards,
Elvis
--
<http://v4escrow.net>
Elvis Daniel Velea
Chief Executive Officer
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
US Phone: +1 (702) 475 5914
EU Phone: +31 (0) 61458 1914
Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in:
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited.