I opposite this proposal. It only will increase the price of the block, RIPE won't be get payment from this scheme and will increase the price of membership
вторник, 9 июня 2015 г. пользователь Petr Umelov написал: > I support Aleksey's opinion (NOT this proposal). > > Why address -policy -wg doesn't tell anything about little influence of > transfers on the system? > > > 11:23, 9 июня 2015 г., Aleksey Bulgakov <[email protected]>: > > -1 > I cannot support this proposal. > There were the calculation was showing little part of transfers from the > last /8. > Also this proposal doesn't close multiple accounts > 09 Июн 2015 г. 11:01 пользователь "Riccardo Gori" <[email protected]> > написал: > > Support +1 > > regards > Riccardo > > Il 11/05/2015 13.43, Marco Schmidt ha scritto: > > Dear colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in > 2015-01, "Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations" has been > published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has > also been published. You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis > at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 and the > draft document at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01/draft We > encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > [email protected] before 9 June 2015. Regards, Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC > > > > -- > Riccardo Gori e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] > > > > > -- > Regards -- ----- Kind regards, Sergey Stecenko
