As said many-many times /22 reselling from last /8 is not significant. I really tired to repeat this. And It's objective view. You (and anybody else) can calculate all digest which were brought and make sure it's really so.
But I hear again and again that "we should stop abusing", "it's not intend of last /8 policy" etc WITHOUT real arguments. It will be better to start from owners of really big (and unused) blocks which were allocated by RIPE NCC to such owners before last /8. 09.06.2015, 23:32, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:07:59PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> > With the limited amount of data available (since this effect only started >> > over the last year or so), you can fit about every curve you like into >> > it - exponential, linear, quadratic. None will be a very reasonable >> > projection. >> >> So we can't say exactly "there are progressive IPv4 exhaustion" and we have >> nothing to worry about right now. Yes? > > We see behaviour that is unwanted, and is violating the expressed spirit > of the last /8 policy. > > And your own numbers nicely demonstrated that this is growing quite fast. > > So, thanks for making the point that this policy is indeed necessary. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
