Hi Tore, > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tore Anderson
> I'll note that both authors' LIRs (uk.mod and de.kaufland) already hold > an IPv6 /29 allocation each...so assuming the proposal was intended to > help scratch an itch of their own, so to speak, perhaps this is > simply an omission? It was our (uk.mod's) expectation/assumption that it would be possible to return an existing allocation (in an 'unused/as-new' state) and apply for another under the new criteria. Regards, Mathew
