Hi Walter,
be assured that the large telcos also need IPv4 addresses. If we return
to need based policy, they will use up all remaining IPv4 addresses in a
few days. This does not help anybody.
But if you think anything should be changed, then please write a new
policy proposal and start the discussion.
Regards,
Wilhelm
Am 28.08.2015 um 14:17 schrieb SBS - Support:
Hi Tore,
That is like running away from responsibility of policing usage based
on need and promoting illicit IP trading. If need is justified there
has to be a process to allocate additional IP resources.
Regards,
Walter
---- On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:55:07 +0200 *Tore Anderson <[email protected]>*
wrote ----
* SBS - Support <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> The RIPE policy of allocating only a PA /22 to new LIR's and not
> allocating any further IPv4 resources is highly detrimental to the
> growth of new upcoming organisations and protects legacy Telco
> operators, what are your thoughts on reviewing this and coming up
> with a process to allocate further resources to new LIR's if the
need
> can be justified.
If we hadn't done it that way, we would today not have had IPv4
addresses at all to allocate to new upcoming organisations.
None.
Zip, zilch, zero.
How would that have been any less detrimental?
Tore
This electronic message contains information from Sona Business
Services (SBS) which may be privileged and confidential. The
information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete
this message immediately.
