On 17/04/16 05:50, Randy Bush wrote:
well, it is some years too late for it to go along with the last /8,
policy unless you have a time machine. but it might mean we won't have
to deal with the endless proposals to modify the last /8 policy which
seem to come up every year, flood the mailing list, and eventually fail.
Exactly, the sad part is, this is essentially the last and only thing you
can propose a policy regarding v4.
not exactly. one can propose something in the opposite direction;
allocations from the last /8 be reduced to /24. it may make ipv4
last longer for the new entrants. and a /24 should be sufficient
for a large nat.
i.e. i was serious the other day.
randy
I see the same explanation again and again and again. But I see no real
argument from you guys. No statistics, no trending, no prediction, just
"keep the ipv4 last longer". Can you do better than that?
