On Fri, Apr 22, 2016, at 10:46, Stepan Kucherenko wrote: > Last /8 policy came with some strings attached (IPv6 allocation) but > there is no way a new LIR will show some IPv6 progress before initial > IPv4 allocation was made. But with additional allocation it IS possible > to check if they even done anything in that time.
Right now, there's no string attached. As long as the issue of "new player, get IPv6 ASAP" one of the 2 ways to achieve this is to stop handing out allocations directly, but "lease" them for X months/years, and recover it if no IPv6 has been deployed in the meanwhile. The complexity of such a thing is much higher, but if anybody would find the good wording for this, I would support. The second one would be "no more IPv4 at all". We're not there yet. > 5-stars RIPEness with even higher thresholds + AAAA on main site + IPv6 > as part of usual services to customers ? It will be hard to achieve > without actual rollout, and additional allocations to LIRs will be > either small in number or useful. I agree, with the reserve of clearly defining "main site".
