On 22/04/16 16:05, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Regarding the current allocation policies, you still have not addressed
the query that several people have raised about why it is better to shut
off opportunities for future internet service market entrants than it is
to make things marginally easier for a small segment of the existing
market for a short period of time, other than "but it hurts".
Nick
I think this has not been expressed directly, but IPv6 implementation
obligations in this policy might be the reason why it could be MUCH
better than existing policy who offers the opportunities for future
entrants but does not have a long term solution for the real problem
(IPv4 exhaustion).
