On Sat, May 14, 2016, at 10:16, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > This seems like putting the cart before the horse. > > Allocation conditions should be introduced _first_, as a "part A".
Ok, got it, I messed the order. Sill, the question remains on what is the scope of "Part A" (condition for allocation) ? For old LIRs (that got an allocation before 14/09/2012), that shouldn't be a problem unless community decides otherwise The question is for new LIRs : how can you ask them to fulfill the conditions when they never had anything (nada, zero, LIR just opened) in the first place ? - ask them to start deployment using somebody else's space (ASSIGNED PA from transit, leased space) ? - lease them the block for X months/years (trial period) than take it back if at the end of trial period the condition is not met ? - keep the current status for them, which pretty much voids the purpose of the condition ? -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
