5.1.4. All allocations will be marked in the RIPE database as ‘ALLOCATED FINAL’
Does it mean that all IPs from the 185./8 will be markead as ‘ALLOCATED FINAL’ or I am wrong? 2016-05-17 21:12 GMT+03:00 Roger Jørgensen <[email protected]>: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Marco Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear colleagues, >> >> A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-03, "Locking Down the Final /8 Policy" >> is now available for discussion. > > What really amaze me. We are using tons of time here in ag-wg talking > over IPv4 while there is not half that activity over in IPv6-wg. > > > I take that as a statement that everyone know everything there is to > know about IPv6, there are nothing more to discuss or learn, no > questions to ask, we are all using it so very few people are left > behind in IPv4 land... soon to be isolated island not able to talk > with anyone. > > ... is that how it is? > > > > Why aren't all of you with HUGE and MAJOR problem (sorry for the caps) > with lack of IPv4 address over in IPv6-wg bombing us with question on > how to get out of your current trouble? > Asking all kind of stupid and newbie questions? I'm very sure there > are tons of people standing in line to help you out. > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/ipv6 > > > > > > PS 1 : chairs - I object to this policy and the other one trying to > sort a problem that can't be sorted in IPv4 land, only IPv6 can. > > > PS 2 : Nick Hillard summarized it very well here: > <start copy> > Like the curate's egg, this proposal is good in parts. Here's the good part: > >> - Explicitly state that the current IPv4 allocation policy applies to >> all available IPv4 address space held by the RIPE NCC that has not >> been reserved or marked to be returned to IANA > <end copy> > > -- > > Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE > [email protected] | - IPv6 is The Key! > http://www.jorgensen.no | [email protected] > -- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29
