Agree on this.
It's not only we erode the free pool faster, but we get a lot of
unconscious RIPE NCC members this way.
On 06/12/16 00:44, Aled Morris wrote:
So for all those people who argue we should be preserving the
remaining address space in order to allow for new ISPs entering the
market for as long as possible (which I agree with), we need to be
realistic about end users who want (what was once called) PI space and
not make the only option to be "become an LIR" with the result that we
erode the free pool faster (i.e. allocating /22 when a /24 would be
more than adequate.)
Aled
--
Kind regards,
CTO at
*Foton Telecom CJSC*
Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99
AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator
<https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861>
http://ipv6actnow.org/
