-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi all, dear Jan, On 09/06/2016 17:23, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > In other words, it's fine for a LIR to be an end user, and in > principle, it seems sensible that policy acknowledges that, but > avoids making unnecessary limitations that interfere with that. I agree that a lot of LIRs are End Users. But the important point is that most End Users, however, are *not* LIRs which really means we cannot take the ones for the others. So, if the meaning of "last /8" policy is to let End Users have a minimal vital access to the ressource, then we must really write "End User" when we think "End User". Which leads to a very different wording (and meaning) of the policy that is to be obeyed by a LIR. Best regards, Sylvain -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iF4EAREIAAYFAldez/kACgkQJBGsD8mtnREZFgD+INALGOduxHzQ+4hX51fLXey8 3Ys5t8DDJNe448pWbK8A/i+Sfudir5dprT0LXKQSONFN9KYgond3sKSWW8Ki06pF =gta2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
