On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 21:09, Remco van Mook wrote: > Let me get this straight - you oppose a proposed change in policy because > the change itself is not part of current policy?
No, more people than you expected oppose it because you make an explicit reference to allocation made after a certain date in the past: <snip> All allocations made by the RIPE NCC to LIRs after 14 September 2012 will be marked in the RIPE Database as “ALLOCATED FINAL”. </snip> Just remove "after 14 September 2012" and you ban all transfers. Not necessarily a bad idea. > Also, those "heavily disadvantaged members" as you describe them, only > have received address space thanks to a particularly selfless decision by > the community at the time to dedicate the last remaining address space to > that purpose, rather than just blowing through it by early 2013. Like in "we won't kill you with a bullet in the head, we will kill you by letting you slowly bleed to death". Thanks. Now you try to regulate how you are allowed (or not) to heal yourself. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
