hi, On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:49:59PM +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote: > I am strongly against to every proposal that higher the disvlaantage to > already disvantaged new and future pyers (LIRs after 09/2012)
This proposal actually will only disadvantage "young LIRs" if they want
to do stuff with their /22 that is frowned upon by the community - namely,
trade, instead of "use for customers".
The *reason* why this is proposed is to discourage stockpiling of /22s
(by opening many new LIRs, waiting two years, transfer it all into a
joint LIR and close the others off) - taking away /22s that are supposed
to be used by further new entrants into the market.
A LIR that receives space, runs a network, addresses its customers, and
might even be potentially bought one day is *not* affected (unlike
version 1 of the proposal) - though the proposal might be clearer on the
intended effects of M&A.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
