On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Daniel Suchy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > Hello, > > Do we really want do block new organisations with new allocations, but > allow old (happy) one to do anything with addresses tehy have...? That's > not fair. > I'm afraid that "fair" in that regard, is impossible to achieve. > There're organisations, which have large allocations and they're > sometimes not taking care - they have enough IPv4 addresses, nothing is > pushing them to implement IPv6, or save address space by implementation > of some NAT solution. If they decide to sell their business, policy will > allow that - but, if "new" resource holder will try similar thing, > policy will ban then? > No, the new policy does not ban selling their business (merger/acquisition). My point is simple - there should be ONLY ONE POLICY - independent on > time of allocation. Such policy must limit not only new LIRs (using > addresses from last /8), but also old LIRs holding addresses from old > allocations. > Why do you want to do that? > > And if we really want to reclaim some address space, we should review > current allocations - in terms of current situation in IPv4 world. > > How do you propose to go about that? -- Jan
