Hello,
I think this was discussed during the last RIPE meeting and it was
rejected by Nigel due to not being "legal" to raise fees like this.
Regards,
Radu
On 06/21/2016 12:20 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I just had a thought.
What we're trying to do is to make sure there are IPv4 addresses
available to new entrants. We're trying to do this by making a LIR get
one post-exhaustion /22 each. The LIR fee is the limiting factor in
trying to stop people from getting many /22:s. People have been trying
to game this, by getting /22 and closing the LIR, thus avoiding the
LIR fee. Changes in the policy has been all about trying to limit
transfers etc, setting policy from what should happen with /22s,
stopping transfers (so people still have to pay LIR fees, one per /22
etc).
Since it's actually the post-exhaustion /22 we're after why not do this:
The post-exhaustion /22 comes with a fee that is equivalent to the LIR
fee. If a LIR contains one post-exhaustion /22, then this fee is waived.
Doesn't this just solve the problem everybody is arguing about? Now
all of a sudden it's not cheap to get multiple /22s, and we don't care
any more if people keep their LIRs open or not, it still costs the same.
