Marco Schmidt wrote: > If the RIPE community disagrees with this understanding or feels that > the current wording of section 2.9 is ambiguous, we invite a policy > proposal that provides an adjusted End Site definition. > > I hope this clarifies.
Hi Marco, Thanks for clarifying. The alternative was awkward: http://i.imgur.com/J8vJwYR.jpg It looks like the interpretation and the wording are slightly at variance, albeit in favour of common sense, so the wording should probably be regarded as a policy bug which needs to be fixed. Nick
