Hi Nick, On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:55:20PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Gert Doering wrote: > > Nick Hilliard - "because it will create underground and unregistered > > transfers of non-transferrable /22s" > > > > answered by Sander Steffan > > I should have replied at the time because Sander's response was, in my > opinion, inadequate:
I found it convincing, but most likely I'm not as pessimistic yet regarding
what people might be willing to do for a bit of extra money.
(I do also see the risk for the buyer as totally inacceptable, as long
as there are "official and documentable" transfers available)
Anyway: formally we're outside any phase where opposition to the proposal
would be recorded, so I take this as clarification regarding my summary
(thanks).
Please do not let us stop you from repeating your concerns in the review
phase, of course - but of course, please do take the impact analysis into
account (the NCC might see the same risk, or not).
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
