Hello Peter, *"non-continuous IPv4 blocks be exchanged for the equivalent size in a single continuous IPv4 block"*
Correct. Best regards, Abdelouahed Ping IP network 2016-09-22 14:46 GMT+02:00 Peter Hessler <[email protected]>: > Hi > > Clarification question. > > Are you requesting that non-continuous IPv4 blocks be exchanged for the > equivalent size in a single continuous IPv4 block that does not match the > previously issued IPv4 addresses, or do you want to take continuous IPv4 > blocks and combine them? > > > On 2016 Sep 22 (Thu) at 14:37:25 +0200 (+0200), Ping IP wrote: > :Hello, > : > :One of the goals of RIPE is to aggregate IP addresses. I'd like to suggest > :the ability for a LIR and End User to exchange number of blocks of IP > :ranges for a greater block. > : > :For example: > :LIR/End User has 4 different /22 subnets and LIR/End User can exchange > :these subnets for 1 x /20 subnet. > : > :This gives a LIR or End User the possibility to announce larger IP subnets > :to the Internet. Helping the goal of aggregating the IP addresses on the > :Internet. > : > :According one of the RIPE trainer, this is currently not possible > according > :the RIPE policy. Because there's no policy to give a LIR/End User this > :ability. > : > :I'm curious to what you think of this idea. > : > :Best regards, > : > :Abdelouahed > :Ping IP network > > -- > People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that > Benjamin Franklin said it first. > >
