On 21/09/17 15:18, Randy Bush wrote: > indeed. but i see it as inevitable as the need to bridge becomes more > and more intense. so do we want to do it in a controlled and managed > fashion or chaotically?
Over half of the table is made-up of /24s; that is not a coincidence. If any new "standard" is chosen for the minimum visible prefix size, you can bet all of those /24 announcements will start turning into a lot more /25 announcements very quickly. "But otherwise I'm liable to hijack!", ad infinitum. I dunno about you, but I can see a lot of operators not being too happy with a ~25% increase in the number of prefixes they're storing in TCAM. -- Tom Hill Network Manager Bytemark Hosting http://www.bytemark.co.uk/ tel. +44 1904 890 890
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
