Yes, this seriously smells like someone really bored having too much time and looking for new opportunities, a quick count tells me that it will be 5 times harder to get policy developments through , if at all...
Or can someone think of some actual benefits of this might have? /vanity... For Internal Use Only -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Erik Bais Sent: 16. maaliskuuta 2018 16:20 To: Marco Schmidt <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)" The question that came to mind was ... Is the IANA transition done yet ? Good. Let's start another one ... /ponder ... On 16/03/2018, 12:49, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Dear colleagues, We would like to make you aware of a policy proposal that is being discussed in the LACNIC community, called "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)". You can find the proposal here: https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2018-1?language=en This is a global policy proposal, meaning that it would apply to all five RIRs. However, each RIR community would first need to ratify an identical version of the policy before it could be implemented. No such policy proposal has yet been submitted in our service region. We will let you know of any further developments. You can find more on the global policy development process here: https://www.nro.net/policies/global-policies-development-process/ Kind regards Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
