Hi Denis, > The DB part is simply to add an attribute. The mechanics of that is pretty > straight forward. The reason for adding it and its strict definition and > perhaps status as a 'fixed' attribute value are more address policy or > services.
I don't think it fits in APWG. It doesn't change the allocation/assignment policy, only the bookkeeping. I think this policy proposal belongs in DBWG. Cheers, Sander
