Hello, is there any feedback on this proposal? While it is more a clarification than an actual policy change, then it might clear some confusion to create assignments for LIR own infrastructure within their allocation.
Best regards, Martin Tonusoo IP Network Engineer -------------------------- CITIC Telecom CPC www.citictel-cpc.com -------------------------- Direct: +372 622 3321 NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300 NOC 24/7: +7 495 9815670 From: "Marco Schmidt" <[email protected]> To: "address-policy-wg" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:00:50 PM Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2019-01 New Policy Proposal (Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA") Dear colleagues, A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now available for discussion. This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01 As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer. At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal. We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <[email protected]> before 15 February 2019. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Officer RIPE NCC
