Dear colleagues, This proposal makes sense to us. We support it.
Best Regards. El lun, 11-03-2019 a las 16:25 +0000, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg escribió: > > Dear colleagues, > > After reading the Impact Analysis, i wish to express my support to > 2019-01. > > Best Regards, > Carlos Friaças > > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Marco Schmidt wrote: > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is > > now in the Review Phase. > > > > This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status > > "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure. > > > > The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis to support the community?s > > discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01 > > > > And the draft documents at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01/draft > > > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four > > week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact > > analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy > > Document. > > > > At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG > > has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your > > opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous > > phase. > > > > We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document > > and send any comments to <[email protected]> before 9 April 2019. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Marco Schmidt > > Policy Development Officer > > RIPE NCC > > > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum > >
