Hi,
Just a small note:
2019-03 is not about "anti-spam", it's about "hijacks".
(if some people are not able to abide by the RIR/registry work, then why
they need to be part of it?)
As far as we authors have been told, the doubt was really between the
anti-abuse WG and the routing WG.
In fact, as similar proposals are at the table already at LACNIC (see
LAC-2019-05) and ARIN (more or less, see prop-266), this might be touched
(i hope) during the PDO's presentation. :-)
Best Regards,
Carlos
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Randy Bush wrote:
perhaps, as it is, imiho, more address policy than anti-spam, the
anti-abuse wg proposal 2019-03
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03
would be worth a bit of consideration as address policy?
randy
