> On 15 Jul 2019, at 13:02, Tore Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't believe this kind of policy making is good for the community. I > suspect the opposite is true, by turning legacy holders off from engaging > with us. Keep in mind that they are under no obligation to do so. +1
- Re: [addr... Randy Bush
- Re: [addr... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [addr... Sander Steffann
- Re: [addr... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [addr... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg] questio... Tore Anderson
- Re: [address-policy-wg] qu... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg... Tore Anderson
- Re: [address-polic... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-p... Tore Anderson
- Re: [addr... Jim Reid
- Re: [addr... Kai 'wusel' Siering
- Re: [addr... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [addr... Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Re: [addr... Sascha Luck [ml]
- Re: [addr... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [addr... Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Re: [addr... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [addr... Gert Doering
- Re: [addr... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [addr... Gert Doering
