Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote on 13/11/2019 13:41:
A little late, but here's my point of view: - /27 is borderline for a default. Hopefully the 50% use within 2 years should alleviate this (even if I find it not enough). - Anything smaller than a /27 is close to useless. - Renumbering is painful and should be avoided as much as possible. - IXP growth may be very variable in time. You may struggle for1-2 years, then add several dozens members the next year. You may easy get in a situation when renumbering falls in a period of rapid growth, which only makes things worse.
The purpose of a policy should be to fix a specific problem.
As you're speaking in favour of the proposal, can you describe what problem you want to see fixed here?
Nick
