Hi Mathias,

> I will be quite frank about this and say that it feel very disheartening to 
> essentially miss the 0 day queue allocations by 5 days. end up in a one month 
> long quque that just grows with no more allocations and on top of that it is 
> VERY obvious that these organisations uses the members list as a "To be 
> customers" base because about 4 hours after we became members we got mails 
> and phonecalls from about 5 different companies stating they want to sell us 
> IP adresses.
> 
> It just feels like this is not what RIPE was intended for but obviously is 
> being used for.
> 
> I apologize if i am sounding too salty or if my mail is not according to well 
> established RIPE etiquette, and dont get me wrong. we are VERY happy about 
> being a new member with a single LIR and getting our own IPv6 and insight 
> into the future of the internet, just felt that i should give the point of 
> view of exactly one of those "Small new one lir members" that many here 
> reffer to and exactly how our experience with this issue has been..

Don't worry, you talk about your frustration quite politely :)  And it is 
totally justified. This is why I think something needs to be done now. Yes, 
it's rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic, but some people are still trying to 
survive.

As a new member, what do you think about these ideas? Would it be good to make 
addresses untransferable? Or keep them transferable but ask the NCC to impose a 
one-time merger&acquisition fee? Or any other way? What would be ok for your 
real internet business but not for address sellers?

Cheers,
Sander


-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg

Reply via email to