Hi, On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:40:10AM +0100, Eliot Lear via address-policy-wg wrote: > I like the idea of the NCC (specifically RIPE Labs) just allocating to > themselves a small block of v4 and another of v6 for experiments, and then > delegating portions or the whole of the block for bounded experiments, > keeping the paperwork and process to a minimum. Also, RIPE could perhaps > extort a good talk out of the researchers once the results are published ;-)
"The policy is too complicated, just circumvent it" is not the way we
try to handle policy in RIPE land. If it is so, we try to fix the policy
(or the process).
That said, there is no way the RIPE NCC could assign a reasonably *big*
block of IPv4 - to have multiple /24s available for routing - to itself
under current policy anyway.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
