Hi Nick, Randy, David, Sander, (all,)

agreed, we will remove this part from the proposal.

@David: there was prediction by Marco Schmidt from RIPE at the last meeting. It 
is linked in the proposal.

Regards,
Matthias

--
Dr.-Ing. Matthias Wichtlhuber
Senior Researcher
------------------------------
DE-CIX Management GmbH
Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt (Germany)
phone: +49 69 1730902 141
mobile: +49 171 3836036
fax: +49 69 4056 2716
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.de-cix.net
------------------------------
DE-CIX Management GmbH
Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert
Trade registry: District court (Amtsgericht) Cologne, HRB 51135
Registered office: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Cologne
------------------------------
DE-CIX 25th anniversary: Without you the Internet would not be the same!
Join us on the journey at https://withoutyou.de-cix.net


________________________________________
Von: Nick Hilliard <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2023 21:47:48
An: Matthias Wichtlhuber
Cc: Angela Dall'Ara; RIPE Address Policy Working Group
Betreff: Re: AW: [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP 
IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)

Matthias Wichtlhuber wrote on 08/02/2023 13:36:
> This part of the proposal is intended to foster the adoption of the 
> technology.
> IXPs may offer it as beta or experimental while still doing the actual 
> exchange
> of traffic via standard BGP over IPv4.

Hi Matthias,

this is premature: if the protocol didn't work well in production
environments, that would raise questions about the wisdom of mandating
the protocol in the first place.

In any event, as Randy pointed out, it's generally not a good idea to
use policy in one area to try to force specific technology choices in
another.

Nick

-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg

Reply via email to