Hi, We've not had any feedback on this proposal yet.
As a reminder, this proposal would set "the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes." Support for the proposal, or arguments against it are welcome. Many thanks, Leo Vegoda Address Policy WG co-chair On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 00:26, Angela Dall'Ara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal, 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary > Assignments" > is now available for discussion. > > This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for > temporary assignments to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller > assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also > allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 > for research purposes. > > You can find the full proposal at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide > feedback to the proposers. > > At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposers, with the agreement of > the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal. > > The PDP document can be found at: > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-781 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > [email protected] before 10 March 2023. > > > Kind regards, > > Angela Dall'Ara > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
