Hi everyone, hi Jordi,
I don’t have an opinion +1/-1 on the proposal right now, but I’d like to
comment on your point 2 and what you raised during your talk.
I believe that categorizing or, even worse, “discriminating” against
certain subnets isn’t the best path forward for a healthy internet, nor
will it support our move to IPv6.
If the policy is viable and useful, I would just avoid adding further
restrictions to its purpose.
regards,
Riccardo
Il 30/10/2024 12:02, jordi.palet--- via address-policy-wg ha scritto:
Hi all,
1) Regarding aggregation benefit
The actual way out for organizations that need more than /29 and the
justification is not accepted by the NCC is to create multiple LIRs, so they
received non-aggregated prefixes. We avoid that with the proposal.
2) Stockpiling is the argument against the proposal.
That’s why we had the discussion in the list suggesting to limit it to a single
“upgrade to /28” per organization (for example).
Also in the slides, I indicated that this may be a problem to be resolved by an
additional proposal. Do we want to ask for a justification of those multiples
LIRs? (for example)
I hope to correctly captured those last inputs, otherwise, please, let us know.
In fact, the last comment, I didn’t got it. Not sure if it was just a comment
or a question. If the author can clarify will be happy to respond.
Tks!
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options,
please visit:
https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options,
please visit:
https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
