Hi,

On 27 Aug 2026, at 12:58, James Kennedy via address-policy-wg 
<[email protected]> wrote:

[…]

> 1. The renumbering mechanism punishes IPv6 growth
> 
> This is the concern I raised in Edinburgh, and the IA confirms: considering 
> current reservations, a request for additional PI space “will require 
> renumbering in almost all cases” and “might be highly impactful and 
> time-consuming for network operators”. Basic maths make this inevitable - the 
> RIPE NCC usually reserves 2 bits of headroom around a PI assignment (e.g. /46 
> for a /48), while nibble boundaries require 4. A holder whose IPv6 operations 
> are growing is a success story that we want more of. Policy should make 
> genuine IPv6 growth requests frictionless, not disruptive.
> 
> Please keep in mind in all this that PI is the affordable route to provider 
> independence for smaller organisations and operators in lower-income 
> economies across our service region. These holders are least equipped to 
> absorb a forced renumbering exercise.

Thanks for bringing the issue of fees up, James.

The main reason there is a problem for this proposal to fix is that we have a 
rule requiring the assignment to be the end user. If the network operator had 
an allocation they could make sub-allocations until, eventually, they make an 
assignment to any user. And they’d have at least a /32, which would allow them 
to develop an addressing plan that would support growth for a long time.

So while it’s not within the remit of this WG to solve, perhaps a solution to 
the problem could be found in a new Charging Scheme. At the moment moving from 
paying for a /48 and an ASN to a /32 and an ASN would mean paying 14 times as 
much. 

I support the goal of this proposal, which I see as removing barriers to 
getting the resources needed by legitimate network operators. But the policy 
text is fairly complex and I wonder if that’s because the core issue isn’t 
policy but how much things cost.

Kind regards,

Leo
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
please visit: 
https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the 
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. 
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

Reply via email to