Hi, > Quick question: > I just had a quick view, but is the 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 backport > already based on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01 ? > (or on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-00 ?) > > If the first one is the case, wouldn't it be better to name it > 2.4.32-i386-1.1-01 ? Sure 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 would be missing > but people immediately get the idea that the API, the behaviour > is the same in the 2.6 version (and it also includes the > bug-fixes from 00 to 01).
2.4.3*-r0 corresponds (uncorrectly) to 2.6.*r9. But just before New Year's Eve, Philippe informed me that he wanted to integrate Dmitry's patch himself in every branch and align release numbers. The point was to recover a xenomai svn stable as soon as possible (with all the modifications in every branch and architecture). So, I am not the most appropriate guy to answer you for the moment. Like you, I am trying to keep informed with the modifications. Happy New Year too ! Alexis.
