Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > (...). Finally, I do not see a need for marking a static inline function > > non-traced. (...) > > Marking a function inline does not guarantee that the said function will > always be inlined, especially since with 2.6.16, inline no longer > necessary means __attribute__((always_inline)). >
Yep, correct, though this particular function should only be non-inlined by a confused compiler. So, shouldn't we rather convert this function into a macro or mark it as always_inline? A review of the tracer for further clarifications is required, I guess. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Adeos-main mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
