I'm currently working with a board that's hardware support is focused mainly on the 2.6.17 kernel revision. I was wondering if there is a specific reason the ipipe patches jumped from 2.6.14/15 to 2.6.19/20 other than the desire to move to the most up-to-date kernel as possible. My reasoning is that in an effort to get adeos up on my board I took the most recent prior patch,
adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-arm-1.5-08.patch and applied it to my board's functional kernel (2.6.17.9) and manually made the changes that the patch could not apply based on the diff discrepancies between the linux versions. I had mild success in that I can compile the kernel happily, however at runtime it appears to stall. After reading through the Xenomai wiki for i-pipe porting and a few of the mailing lists I am starting to wonder if my 'shoehorning' approach is too naive, and feedback would be greatly appriciated. Will Wiles, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Adeos-main mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
