As far as I know, support for AT91SAM9260 is now in adeos, so it is better to use the last version of adeos. For MAC-B it is now in vanilla kernel (at least since 2.6.23), and in 2.6.24 there is also a bug fix for underrun.
-- Gregory CLEMENT Adeneo Adetel Group 2, chemin du Ruisseau 69134 ECULLY - FRANCE Tél. : +33 (0)4 72 18 08 40 - Fax : +33 (0)4 72 18 08 41 2008/2/22, Kristoffer Rönnblom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, just wondering if the new ADEOS-patch > adeos-ipipe-2.6.20-arm-1.8-03.patch is applied on the same > way as the old patch, according to Gregory, in april 24 2007: > > "Hi, > this is the last version of patch support for AT91SAM926x, it now > support AT91SAM9260 and AT91SAM9261 > To use it: > - take a vanilla linux > - apply the I-pipe patch > - apply the AT91 patch, then solve the three rejects by hand > - finally apply this patch > > (as we also use NFS root on AT91SAM9260-EK, we needed to had support > for Ethernet MAC B, see > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm/msg12707.html and > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm/msg12961.html ) > > As there is no support for AT91SAM9263 in at91 patch in 2.6.19 > kernel, we prefer wait for 2.6.20 (or higher) ipipe version for > integrate this chip. > > Gregory CLEMENT" > > Or is the new patch improved so that the AT91-patch is unecessary, aswell > as the support for ethernet MAC B? > > /Kristoffer Roennblom > _______________________________________________ > Adeos-main mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main > > www.adetelgroup.com _______________________________________________ Adeos-main mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
