Hi Adam, inspired means it will be based on the ADF Faces skinning framework. We evaluated Tobago's and Trinidad's thing, and we decided for the Trinidad way. Whatever extensions we write, will go to both Trinidad and Tomahawk (the definitive goal would be a common module we could both base upon).
regards, Martin On 6/14/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Catalin, One quick comment: I don't see a reason to write a skinning framework "inspired by" the Trinidad skinning. Trinidad is part of MyFaces; why not work on taking the Trinidad skinning framework and bringing it into the overall MyFaces world? -- Adam On 6/14/06, Catalin Kormos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I just want to say that it sounds to me like a very good ideea, having the > same skin take care of browsers incompatibilities for example, rather than > having different skins take care of that, with need of user intervention; > i'm working on the future skinning framework for MyFaces (at least i hope it > will become that), which is very much inspired by the current state of the > ADF Faces skinning. It's going to be done during the Google's SoC program > btw. Would be ok if i take some inspiration from this too? :) > > A concern of mine would be about the :lang pseudo selector. Maybe this one i > didn't get quite right, but wouldn't this interfere with the standard usage > of the :lang pseudo selector, for styling components that renderer their own > different "lang" attribute value, maybe on the same page? this might not be > the case for ADF Faces components though. > > Regards, > Catalin > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
